首页> 外文OA文献 >Sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation as a treatment for urge incontinence in patients with detrusor instability: Results of chronic electrical stimulation using an implantable neural prosthesis
【2h】

Sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation as a treatment for urge incontinence in patients with detrusor instability: Results of chronic electrical stimulation using an implantable neural prosthesis

机译:de骨(S3)节段神经刺激治疗逼尿肌不稳定患者急迫性尿失禁:使用植入式神经假体进行慢性电刺激的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

textabstractMost patients with urge incontinence and idiopathic detrusor instability are initially treated conservatively with bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and biofeedback, while in the majority this regimen will be supplemented with anticholinergic drugs. The urinary incontinence guideline panel has summarized the literature on results achieved with various drugs for urge incontinence, and found that oxybutynin and terodiline appeared to be the most effective.[1] Subjective cure rates of up to 44 percent over placebo and decreased urinary incontinence rates in up to 56 percent over placebo were achieved with these drugs.[1] Interestingly, no changes in urodynamic parameters were found in well designed drug trials despite symptomatic improvement.2 and 3 Fortunately, many patients seem to be satisfied with a less than optimal result. Patients who do not achieve an acceptable condition remain a therapeutic problem and alternative procedures, with variable success rates, such as bladder transection, transvesical phenol injection of the pelvic plexus, augmentation ileocystoplasty and even urinary diversion, are being advocated.[4]\ud\udUnilateral sacral segmental nerve stimulation by a permanent foramen S3 electrode (neuromodulation) offers a nondestructive alternative for those whose condition is refractory to conservative measures. The aim of this treatment modality is to achieve detrusor inhibition by chronic electrical stimulation of afferent somatic sacral nerve fibers via an implanted electrode coupled to a subcutaneously placed pulse generator. The ratio of this treatment modality is based on the existence of spinal inhibitory systems that are capable of interrupting a detrusor contraction. Inhibition can be achieved by electrical stimulation of afferent anorectal branches of the pelvic nerve, afferent sensory fibers in the pudendal nerve and muscle afferents from the limbs.5, 6 and 7 Most of these branches and fibers reach the spinal cord via the dorsal roots of the sacral nerves. Of the sacral nerve roots the S3 root is the most practical for use in chronic electrical stimulation.[8] We evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment modality in patients with urge incontinence due to bladder instability.
机译:大多数急迫性尿失禁和特发性逼尿肌不稳定的患者最初都会通过膀胱再培训,骨盆底运动和生物反馈进行保守治疗,而在大多数情况下,该方案将补充抗胆碱能药物。尿失禁指南小组总结了使用各种药物治疗急迫性尿失禁所取得的成果,并发现奥昔布宁和特洛地林似乎是最有效的。[1]这些药物的主观治愈率比安慰剂高44%,尿失禁率比安慰剂低56%。[1]有趣的是,尽管有症状改善,但在精心设计的药物试验中未发现尿动力学参数发生变化。2和3幸运的是,许多患者似乎对治疗效果未达到理想水平感到满意。未能达到可接受状态的患者仍然存在治疗问题,并且提倡采用成功率可变的替代方法,例如膀胱横断术,经盆腔静脉输注盆腔神经丛,扩大胆囊成形术,甚至尿流改道。[4] \ ud \ ud通过永久性孔S3电极对单侧神经节段进行刺激(神经调节),为那些条件较保守的患者提供了非破坏性选择。该治疗方式的目的是通过经由与皮下放置的脉冲发生器耦合的植入电极的慢性电刺激of神经传入神经纤维来实现逼尿肌抑制。这种治疗方式的比率基于能够抑制逼尿肌收缩的脊柱抑制系统的存在。可以通过电刺激骨盆神经传入肛门直肠分支,阴部神经传入神经感觉纤维和四肢肌肉传入神经来实现抑制作用。5、6和7这些分支和纤维中的大多数通过脊髓的背根到达脊髓神经。在3神经根中,S3根最适合用于慢性电刺激。[8]我们评估这种治疗方式在由于膀胱不稳而引起的急迫性尿失禁患者中的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bosch, Ruud; Groen, Jan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号